📑 Topics
PII Detection and Anonymization
PII work is less about a single benchmark winner and more about workflow fit. The practical choice depends on whether the archive needs flexible backend integration, visible anonymization review, or both.
Current View
This summary emphasizes operational choices rather than raw score ranking alone.
Default recommendation
Use Presidio as the default integration layer when the goal is to embed PII detection inside a multilingual archive workflow.
Where MAPA fits
Use MAPA when anonymization behavior, human review, and demonstrable interface-level workflows matter most.
Main caveat
Russian results are not yet part of the public PII note, so the cross-language picture is still incomplete.
Current signal
The current evidence supports a split conclusion: Presidio for extensibility, MAPA for anonymization-centered review support.
Evidence Notes
The published benchmark note focuses on Presidio, MAPA, and legal-domain release-review support.